Tag Archive for: ICH

ICH M4Q(R2): The Exciting Evolution of eCTD Modules 2.3 and 3.2

ICH M4Q(R2), “The Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use” is a revised draft version of the guidance that outlines how the quality sections of your medicinal product dossier are presented.

ICH M4Q(R2) was signed off as a Step 2 document in May 2025. Public consultation closed in October 2025. In February 2026 an overview of the comments were published. It was 145 pages long! These comments will be taken into consideration by ICH M4Q (R2) Expert Working Group in the context of Step 3 of the ICH process. Step 4 is aimed to be adopted by June 2027.

The ICH M4Q(R2) revision marks an exciting evolution for eCTD Modules 2.3 and 3.2, modernising the Quality section to fully support emerging therapies and structured digital data.

Its objectives are to improve submission and assessment efficiency, resulting in accelerated access to pharmaceuticals by way of the six ‘E’s:

  1. Encouraging global convergence of science- and risk-based regulatory approaches in the preparation of dossiers.
  2. Explaining and defining the organisation and positioning of information for Modules 2 and 3.
  3. Enriching communication between regulators and applicants and enhancing lifecycle and knowledge management.
  4. Embracing product and process innovation.
  5. Enabling efficient use of digital tools for submission and assessment and preparing for the closely linked, upcoming ICH guideline on structured pharmaceutical quality submission.
  6. Elucidating regulatory expectations and supporting efficient assessments, decision making, and actions.

For industry, it hopes to

  • clarify regulatory expectations
  • facilitate the application of the enhanced ICH quality strategy/vision
  • streamline regulatory application preparation
  • improve the quality of submissions
  • facilitate data and information management
  • promote communication with regulators
  • and foster harmonisation and standardisation of data/information requirements for regulatory submissions, while increasing regulatory convergence

But what does this ICH update mean for you?

Module 2.3 will no longer just be a retrospective summary of Module 3. It will serve as the basis of regulatory assessment and will facilitate lifecycle management.

It will be a comprehensive overview of the product and core quality information. Its components will apply science- and risk-based principles.

Module 3 will serve as a repository for the detailed descriptions of methods, data, and other relevant quality information that supports Module 2.3

Most subsections will follow a ‘DMCS’ model:

  • Description: Identifies the material and its key characteristics;
  • Manufacture: Outlines the production process and process controls;
  • Control: Describes quality control measures such as specifications;
  • Storage: Provides container closure system, stability, storage condition, and retest period/shelf life.

 Implementation

As you will see R2 is simply not just a reorganisation of information, it will require careful and detailed planning and efforts to implement. HOWEVER, clarification on transition and implementation timelines are awaited.

Future

Here at ERA, we will keep up to date on this topic, as it evolves, by attending workshops and webinars when they become available.

We hope to see the publication of clear guidance from the regulators and a pragmatic approach adopted (especially for legacy products). We wouldn’t say no to a nice little Q&A document either…

If you would like to discuss any of the above and if you need support with any of your future applications, we are ready to assist you and your team. Feel free to contact us and we will be happy to help.

Written by

Fiona Downey

Fiona Downey 1

Fiona Downey 1

New ICH guideline Q3D on elemental impurities (EMA/CHMP/ICH/353369/2013)

Elemental impurities guideline

What is it…

The ICH has introduced this new guideline to control the elemental impurities that may be present in drug products. It replaces EMEA guidance on Specification limits for residues of metal catalysts or metal reagents (EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4446/2000).

This guideline applies to new drug products (with a new drug substance) and to drug products containing existing drug substances. There are some exemptions, which you can find in the guideline.
It does not apply to drug products used during clinical research stages of development.

CHMP implementation dates for this guideline are
•    New MA application for new products (new drug substance) – June 2016
•    New MA application for products with existing drug substance – June 2016
•    Marketed products including new MR applications of already approved products – Dec. 2017

What does this mean for you?

Elemental Impurities (EIs) in Drug Product (DP) may arise from several sources. They may be residual catalysts that were added intentionally or may be present as impurities (e.g., through interactions with processing equipment, container/closure systems or by being present in components of the drug product, i.e. drug substance, excipients or water).

Because EIs do not provide any therapeutic benefit to the patient, their levels in the drug product should be controlled within acceptable limits. These limits are outlined in the new guideline.

This guideline presents a process by which to assess and control EIs in the drug product using the principle of Risk Management as described in ICH Q9. This process provides a platform for developing a risk based control strategy to limit EIs in the DP.

The Risk Assessment (RA) should be based on scientific knowledge and principles. It should link to safety considerations for patients with an understanding of the product and its manufacturing process, and it should be focused on assessing the level of EIs in a DP in relation to the Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) presented in the guidance.

The summary of RA and any measures taken, to ascertain compliance and the overall control strategy for EIs, including any specification as needed, should be provided in the Regulatory dossier.
The documentation of RA should be maintained in company’s quality system and should be kept for inspection (at the time of GMP inspection of the site by the competent authority).

If RA fails to demonstrate that an EI level is consistently less than the Control Threshold, then additional controls should be established to ensure that the EI levels does not exceed the PDE in the drug product. Approaches that an applicant can pursue include but are not limited to:
•    Modification of the manufacturing steps that result in reduction of EIs,
•    Implementation of in-process controls,
•    Establishment of specification limits for excipients or drug substance or drug product,
•    Selection of appropriate container closure systems.

For marketed products, if the RA concludes that additional controls are to be established then the regulatory impact of these additional controls should be evaluated to see whether it triggers a variation(s) to the existing MA.

Where can I find the relevant information…

The new guideline is available on the EMA website. You can find it by following this link.

We can help…

Ivowen are fully equipped to apply for any such variations on your behalf. Please contact us for more information and for support of your dossier compilation or updates.

Written by Nanda Naik

Nanda Naik

Request a Quote