Regulatory Guidance updates in February 2026

Here are the main highlights of Regulatory Guidance updated in February 2026

HPRA (IE): 

The HPRA promoted the Facilitating and Accelerating Strategic Clinical Trials (FAST-EU).  FAST-EU is a pilot initiative aiming to accelerate the assessment and authorisation of clinical trials running in multiple EU/EEA countries. The pilot is currently open for submissions and is expected to run until early 2027.

MHRA (UK): 

The MHRA published a few updates:

  • Medical devices regulations:
    • Targeted consultation on the indefinite recognition of CE marked devices in Great Britain.
  • Addition of the latest Additional Monitoring List for Jan 2026
  • New information on responsibilities and reporting on nitrosamine impurities

EMA (EU wide)

As always the EMA regularly updates their website – here are some of the highlights from February

  • Medicines – Human:
    • Updated validation checklist for Type II variations
    • Concept paper on the revision of the guidelines on Good
      Manufacturing Practice for medicinal products – Annex 15
      – Qualification and Validation. Public consultation began on 09th February
    • ICH M15 Guideline on general principles for model-informed drug development, document updated
    • Guidance for applicants for the preparation of the ‘precise scope’ section of the variation application form, document updated
  • Medicines – Veterinary:
    • Guideline on quality aspects of mRNA vaccines for veterinary use, Public consultation began in February
    • Question and answer on the information contained within section 4.2 of the SPC on pharmacodynamic properties for pharmaceutical products
  • Annual fees payable to the EMA, page updated
  • Reflection paper on the qualification of non-mutagenic impurities
  • FAQ document published to address common queries and provide guidance on the European Shortages Monitoring Platform (ESMP)
  • List of European Union reference dates (EURD) and frequency of submission of periodic safety update reports (PSURs) excel is updated
  • List of contact information for the national competent authorities in the EEA page updated
  • Updated PRAC report templates
  • Guidance on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP) updated
  • Summary from the industry stakeholder webinar on the revised guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use
  • The next eAF Q&A will be on the 9th of March

CMDH (MRP/DCP):

  • Agenda for the 24-25 Feb Meeting
  • Report from the CMDh meeting held on 27-28 January 2026
  • Q&A – Generic Applications

eSubmissions:

  • Updated PLM Portal eAF Release notes (version: 1.2.1.6 – Release date 16/02/2026)

For any support you might need to navigate the latest guidance or just for assistance with your procedure preparations, submissions, responses, etc., you can contact us on info@eureg.ie.

 

Written by Fiona Downey

Fiona Downey

Fiona Downey

Regulatory Guidance updates in January 2026

Were you aware that the following Regulatory Guidance was updated in January 2026?

 

HPRA (IE): 

  • Updated fee guidance document for Human medicinal products

MHRA (UK): 

The MHRA have been very busy updating their website in January – here are some of the highlights

  • Medicines: International Recognition Procedure
    • Updated dates indicating the submission deadlines for IRP Route B applications in the IRP Guidance page
  • Medicines: Apply for a variation to your Marketing Authorisation
    • Updated to add new section on Type II variations – ‘Variations to add a new therapeutic indication’
  • Medicines: Statement on new review of paracetamol safety during pregnancy
    • Paracetamol should be taken as directed in the patient information leaflet
  • Medicines: that you can export from the UK or hoard
    • Updated to add: Aspirin (strength: all; pharmaceutical form: all); and Ifosfamide (strength: 1g/2g; pharmaceutical form: powder for solution for injection vials)
  • Medicines: get scientific advice from MHRA
    • Removed info box at the top of the page as out of date
  • Human and Veterinary: Register of licensed manufacturing sites
    • Updated to add the MS and MANSA registers for January 2026
  • Updates to the Orphan Register
  • Early Access to Medicines Scheme: Overview
    • Updated scientific opinion dates for EAMS 2026
  • Clinical Trials: apply for authorisation in the UK
    • Updated to provide link and information under ‘Combined review of an investigative medicinal product and medical device – IMP+Device’
  • Patients to benefit sooner as UK boosts clinical trials attractiveness with faster assessment and agile regulation
  • Borderline products: how to tell if your product is a medicine
    • Updated to add Statistics table for May-October 2025

EMA (EU wide)

As always, the EMA regularly update their website – here are some of the highlights from January

  • EMA post-authorisation guidance – updated
  • Dates of 2026 Scientific Advice meetings and submission deadlines
  • Medicines: Use of Paracetamol during pregnancy unchanged in the EU
    • Recent publication confirms no increased risk of autism, ADHD or intellectual disability
  • EMA and FDA set common principles for AI in medicine development
  • IRIS guide for applicants – updated
  • Meeting highlights from Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC)
  • Meeting highlights from Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products (CVMP)
  • Published the Annual report of the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Inspectors working group 2024
  • Q&A about the clinical study data proof-of-concept pilot for industry – published
  • One Health Approach
    • updated to include ‘One Health task force‘ section
  • Q&A clinic: New Variation classification in eAF (recording available)
  • 3 year rolling work plan for the Quality Innovation Group (QIG)

CMDH (MRP/DCP):

  • Updated ‘contact points’ excel
    • This excel provides names, email addresses and phone numbers for seeking advice from each member state in the EU/UK for regulatory procedures
  • National recommendations for requests to act as RMS – updated
  • Recommendation for classification of unforeseen variations according to Article 5 – corrected
  • ASMF workshare procedure user guidance – updated

eSubmissions:

  • Updated PLM Portal eAF release notes
  • European Shortages Monitoring Platform (ESMP)
    • Expanding to include: new tools and features to better support stakeholders in preventing, managing and mitigating medicine shortages
  • Updated Variation Regulation Classification Guideline
    • has been made available in the interactive pdf eAF v1.28.0.0 and in the PLM Portal web-based variation form January 2026 version
  • Go-Live announcement for EU eCTD v4.0 optional use for Centralised Procedure new MAAs

 

For any support you might need to navigate the latest guidance or just for assistance with your procedure preparations, submissions, responses, etc., you can contact us on info@eureg.ie.

 

Written by Alice D’Alton

Alice Dalton 1

Alice Dalton 1

Implementation of the revised variations categories – EU and UK

Are you ready to implement the revised variations categories guidance?

As of today (15th January 2026) they are to be used for any variation procedure submitted in the EU and UK : EU – New Variations Guidelines in the EC’s Official Journal

Regulation (EU) 2024/1701 of 11 March 2024, amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2008 was entered into force on 7 July 2024. It became applicable on 1 January 2025. The new categories are effective from 15th January 2026.

The changes are summarised as follows:

  1. This guidance no longer applies to Veterinary Medicinal Products (now governed by Regulation (EU) 2019/6)
  2. The Article 5 recommendations accumulated since 2013, for changes not foreseen in the previous version of the category guidance, have all been incorporated into the new guidance.
  3. The scope of changes, previously designated as A, B C and D are now replaced by E (Admin), Q (Quality), C (Safety, Efficacy & PV) and M (PMF/VAMF).
  4. The latest version of the eAF (e.g. interactive pdf eAF v1.28.0.0 or PLM Portal web-based variation form January 2026 version) must be used from 15th January onwards
  5. Updates to most variation categories include amendments to the conditions to be met, documentation required for submission and addition of notes to clarify when the category is most suitable 
  6. Mandatory Annual Reporting requirements are added
  7. Clarifications on Super-grouping are added
  8. Clarifications on Work-sharing are added
  9. Encouraged use of Post-Approval Change Management Protocol (PACMP) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLCM) 

Remember:

  • Where a variation is considered unclassified, a detailed justification for its submission as a minor variation of Type IB (or major variation of Type II, when requested by MAH) must be included.
  • Where a proposed variation is not considered/classified as a minor variation of Type IB and the relevant authority/agency is of the opinion that it may have a significant impact on the quality, safety or efficacy of the medicinal product, the holder shall be informed immediately. In such cases, the holder will be asked to amend their application and to complete it in accordance with the requirements for a major variation of Type II. Once the valid revised variation application has been received, a major variation of Type II assessment procedure is initiated
  • Where the same variation of Type IB/Type II affects several marketing authorisations owned by the same holder, the holder must submit these variations as a single application for worksharing. If a submission has been made as one or several variations but not including all affected marketing authorisations owned by the same holder in a single application as worksharing, the holder shall amend their application.
  • This Annex does not deal to the classification of extensions, which are exhaustively listed in Annex I of the Variations Regulation. All changes set out in Annex I of the Variations Regulation must be considered extensions of the marketing authorisations

The EU guidance will also apply for the UK and the MHRA want MA Holders to provide also a contents page included with the submission, listing all documents included in the eCTD sequence.

If you would like to discuss any of the above and if you need support for any of your Variation applications we are ready to assist you and your team.

Feel free to contact us and we will be happy to help.

Written by Alice D’Alton

Alice Dalton 1

Alice Dalton 1

 

 

 

 

 

You need to apply Type IA Annual Reporting in the EU in 2025

The Type IA Annual Update, also known as the “Annual report”, is a single submission of all the Type IA variations (not requiring immediate notification) which have been implemented during the previous twelve months.

The Annual report should be submitted as close to 12-month deadline as possible, but ultimately no earlier than 9 months and no later than 12 months after the first implementation date of the Type IAs included in the report.

 

Meaning of implementation for type-IA variations:

For quality changes, ‘implementation’ is when the company makes the change in its own quality system.

This implementation date must be carefully planned and recorded to facilitate submission of your Annual Reports.

 

How to plan the submission of your Annual Report:

As submission of the Annual report is dependent on the implementation of the first type IA variation, its submission date can change every year.

It is very important to note that the Type IA Annual report must fulfil the variation conditions for grouping (or super-grouping if it concerns more than one marketing authorisation).

It is expected that Type IA variations included in an Annual report will not be rejected. However, if rejected, Type IA variations from the annual report can be resubmitted as individual Type IAs immediately (outside of an annual report).

 

CMDh confirmed that although not specified in their guidance, Type IA variations implemented before 1 January 2025 can still be submitted as single type IA variations according to the current rules. The EMA confirmed that Type IA variations implemented in 2024 and not submitted to the Agency by 31 December may also be submitted by MAH no later than 12 months after implementation.

 

Therefore, Type IA variations implemented from 1 January 2025 should be submitted as part of the Annual report.

Type IAs can still be submitted outside the Annual report in the following cases:

  • If they are part of a grouped Type IB or Type II variation
  • If they are part of a super-grouping variation
  • If it involves the resubmission of a Type IA variation previously refused in the Annual report (12-month reporting period is criteria in this situation)
  • In exceptionally cases which should discussed and agreed with the EMA/NCAs.

 

eAF:

There are no current plans to amend the eAF to reflect Annual Reporting, instead, Applicants are advised to include a note in the cover letter and an additional note in the eAF scope to clarify that the application relates to the Annual Update of Type IA variations e.g. as foreseen in the updated Cover letter template:

<Annual update of type IA variation(s)

[X] We confirm that the annual update is submitted within 12 months following the implementation of the first type IA variation applied for in this notification. Implementation date of the first type IA variation:      >

 

If you need any assistance with planning and submission of your Annual Reports, contact us and we will be happy to help.

 

Written by

Fiona Downey

Fiona Downey 1

Fiona Downey 1

COVID-19: Still on your Radar? Current vaccine approval status and what’s on the horizon

It is just over 2 years and 9 months since the WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak a public health emergency of international concern.

In the EU we now have a variety of options to protect us from COVID-19. There are as follows:

Notably, the three initial vaccines that were granted ‘Conditional marketing authorisations’ in December 2020 and January 2021 (Comirnaty – developed by BioNTech & Pfizer, Spikevax – developed by Moderna and Vaxzevria – developed by AstraZeneca) were all issued as ‘Standard marketing authorisations’ in October 2022.

  • Four adaptive vaccines
    Adapted vaccines are intended to provide broader protection against different virus variants following initial vaccination. They include:
  • Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.1
  • Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5
  • Spikevax bivalent Original/Omicron BA.1
  • Spikevax bivalent Original/Omicron BA.4-5

All these authorisations were just recently issued by the EMA, in September and October 2022.

Note that at the end of October 2022, the EMA published a useful visual summary of COVID-19 vaccines, including their platforms, strains, uses and target populations.

The majority were developed specifically to treat COVID-19. However, some were already marketed for other indications but have also been proven to be effective in treating COVID-19. These include several pharmaceutical forms i.e., tablets, injections and solutions for infusions.

Update on potential new COVID-19 vaccines:

With the continuous emergence of variants, it is difficult to keep vaccines fully equipped to match the variants in circulation. However, developing further adaptive vaccines will help to improve neutralisation against circulating strains.

The EMA are still reviewing two other adaptive vaccines which target other strains of the virus. These include the Sanofi Pasteur vaccine called Vidprevtyn containing the beta strain. A possible CHMP opinion of this vaccine is expected at the November meeting.
Another vaccine under review contains both alpha and beta strains. The EMA is still waiting on additional data from the company before a decision on this adaptive vaccine can be made.

Updates and comments on COVID-19 treatments:

With the rise of new omicron sub-variants, currently available monoclonal antibodies will lack activity. Due to this, the EMA is exploring, with developers and international regulators, pathways for rapidly approving new monoclonal antibodies based on an established platform that could be rapidly deployed to tackle emerging variants.

Currently authorised antiviral treatments such as Paxlovid or Veklury, don’t target the spike protein but target other parts of the virus. This makes it more likely that they will remain effective as other viral proteins are less effective. However, it will be important to confirm their activity is not impacted by all these variants that are still emerging.

New antivirals that can be administered orally are currently under development and may provide a wider range of antiviral agents for treating COVID-19 patients in the future.

For further details contact us.

Written by

Claire Brown

Claire Brown

When will DADI application forms replace the current eAFs?

The electronic application forms (eAFs) we are familiar with are in the process of being replaced later this year by a web based digital application form in a new eAF portal. The new eAF portal will look somewhat similar to the current IRIS portal.

This project, known as DADI (Digital Application Dataset Integration), is intended to be used for both CAP (Centrally Authorised Products) & NAP (Nationally Authorised Products) applications to make the future of form-filling and submission-handling more efficient at an EU level.

The Human medicinal product Variation application form will be the first to go live in DADI format. Every person involved in drafting an eAF will need to have an EMA account and user access. Companies who use consultants to prepare eAFs will need to make sure that they assign an EMA role to the consultant.

The next stages of DADI will cover the

  • Veterinary variation application form
  • Initial MAA form for Human and Veterinary products
  • Renewal form for Human and Veterinary products

 How will it work?

  1. The eAF will be filled in using the new eAF portal (via user interface).
  2. The user will then finalise the eAF by generating a PDF rendition
  3. This PDF version must still be included in the eCTD submission, as before.
  4. It will not be possible to submit the form directly from the eAF portal

 When will it happen?

As outlined in the EMA roadmap (link provided below) the two immediate key deliverables are as follows:

Key deliverables Go-Live Time Lines
Year Quarter
Launch of Human variations web-form (parallel use of old and new variation forms as part of a Transition period) 2022 Q4 (October)
Use of variation web form only 2023 Q2 (April)

It is important for all industry stake-holders to keep up to date with the development of these new web-based forms by consulting the EMA website for updates at the various launch stages.

Where can I find information?

  • DADI Network Project Webinar – 18/01/2022 – Live broadcast is available here.
  • The updated DADI roadmap, including key milestones, is available here.
  • The updated version of the DADI Questions and Answers documents is available here.
  • The “Common factors in the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) data standard for Art57(2) and eAF”documents are available in the following link.

The project will be implemented in phases, through a set of projects known as SPOR (Substances, Products, Organisations and Referentials) data management services for Human products. The Union Product Database will be the source of data for Veterinary products.

What is SPOR?

SPOR datasets Description of data types Status
Substance Management Services (SMS) Harmonised data and definitions to uniquely identify the ingredients and materials that constitute a medicinal product. Under Development
Product Management Services (PMS) Harmonised data and definitions to uniquely identify a medicinal product based on regulated information (e.g. marketing authorisation, packaging and medicinal information). Under Development
Organisations Management Services (OMS) Data comprising organisation name and location address, for organisations such as marketing authorisation holders, sponsors, regulatory authorities and manufacturers. Operational
Referentials Management Services (RMS) List of terms (controlled vocabularies) to describe attributes of products, e.g. lists of dosage forms, units of measurement and routes of administration. Operational

Once the above PMS and SMS are in place, pharmaceutical companies should start preparing to replace their current data submission format in Article 57 Database from the eXtended EudraVigilance Product Report Message (XEVPRM) format to the new ISO IDMP compatible format (HL7 FHIR). Webinars and training will be provided by EMA in due course.

 What do Marketing Authorisation Holders have to do at this stage?

  • Marketing authorisation holders need to check their data in SPOR (OMS) to ensure it is accurate and up to date. For CAPs the use of OMS data in the current eAF is already mandatory.
  • Marketing authorisation holders with authorised MA(s) need to check their data in Article 57 database (xEVMPD) to ensure it is accurate and up to date.

 Should you need any support at this stage in getting ready for the new Application Form format please feel free to contact us & the Ivowen team will be here to help.

Written by Marian Winder

marian 150x150 1

Are you ready for the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) implementation?

The Clinical Trials Information System is a harmonised and simplified end-to-end single entry point for clinical trials information in the European Union and in the European Economic Area and will go live on 31 January 2022.

As a single entry point, it will be used for the submission, management and assessment of information throughout the life cycle of a clinical trial. The exchange of information between sponsors and Member States will be fully electronic.

In a recent EMA training webinar, the EMA advise the following to prepare for the CTIS go live date:

EMA has launched the CTIS training webpage containing a substantial amount of training materials and information for the users and organisations to facilitate their preparedness.

Should you need any support in clinical trial application just contact us and the Ivowen team will be here to help.

Written by Fiona Downey

Guidance to avoid Nitrosamines in Biological Medicines

Following the outcome of the Article 31 referral on sartans with a tetrazole ring and the knowledge acquired on N-nitrosamines in medicinal products, EMA together with the EU Network and international partners has continued the review to identify if there are any consequences for medicinal products outside the class of sartans.

Taking into account that N-nitrosamines have been found in sartans with a tetrazole ring but also in other API/medicinal products in September 2019 the CHMP’s opinion was sought by the EMA’s Executive Director in accordance with Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 regarding the detection, management and prevention of presence of N-nitrosamines in medicinal products for human use.

The CHMP adopted a scientific opinion in June 2020, which recommended reviewing biological medicines in addition to medicines containing chemically synthesised active substances.

The risk of presence of nitrosamines must be evaluated by the MAHs/Applicants. In case of risk, confirmatory testing must be performed.

  • A risk evaluation/risk assessment for the presence of nitrosamines must be submitted for new marketing authorization applications at the time of submission, and for already authorized medicinal products containing chemically synthesised active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) as per the ‘call for review’:

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/nitrosamines-emea-h-a53-1490-information-nitrosamines-marketing-authorisation-holders_en.pdf

And for biological medicinal products in a similar exercise, as per instructions to be published in a ‘Questions and Answers document’:

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/nitrosamines-emea-h-a53-1490-questions-answers-information-nitrosamines-marketing-authorisation_en.pdf

  • The approach for risk evaluation/risk assessment should cover manufacturing processes of active substance and finished product in consideration of the root-causes, and subsequent confirmatory testing in the finished product in case a risk is identified
  • Although the overall risk of presence of nitrosamines in biological medicinal products is considered very low, the following risk factors should be taken into consideration:
    • Biologicals containing chemically synthesized fragments, where risk factors similar to chemically synthesized active substances are present,
    • Biologicals using processes where nitrosating reagents are deliberately added,
    • or those packaged in certain primary packaging material, such as blister packs containing nitrocellulose.

For details see CHMP – Assessment Report: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/nitrosamines-emea-h-a53-1490-assessment-report_en.pdf

If you need any clarification or support to help implement the responsibilities of an MAH with regard to Nitrosamines reporting contact us and Ivowen will gladly assist you in a timely manner.

Written by Nanda Naik

Nanda Naik

New pharmaceutical water quality guideline from February 2021

In 2018 the EMA had a public consultation (15th Nov 2018 – 15th May 2019) on draft guidance for industry on the pharmaceutical use of different grades of water in the manufacture of active substances and medicinal products. This consultation has resulted in an update to the old 2002 guidelines and the new guideline will come into effect from February 2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-quality-water-pharmaceutical-use_en.pdf

Within the guideline, it is stated that the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) has set quality standards for three grades of water: water for injections (WFI), purified water and water for preparation of extracts. EMA also notes that potable water, while not covered by a pharmaceutical monograph, “is the prescribed source feed water for the production of pharmacopeial grade waters,” and must comply with the regulations on water intended for human consumption of a quality equivalent to that defined in Directive 98/83/EC or laid down by the competent authority.

The guideline itself provides recommendations for the minimum acceptable quality of water to be used for different uses and applications, including the manufacture of sterile and nonsterile medicinal products, active substances and water used for cleaning and rinsing equipment and container/closures for medicinal products.

The note for guidance has been updated to reflect the following changes in the European Pharmacopoeia:

  • revised monograph for Water for Injections (0169) allowing the possibility to use methods other than distillation for producing water of injectable quality (this change brings the Ph. Eur. more closely in line with the US Pharmacopeia and the Japanese Pharmacopoeia, allowing production of WFI by distillation or by a purification process proven “equivalent or superior to distillation”, and “by distillation or by reverse osmosis and/or ultrafiltration”, respectively);
  • new monograph for Water for preparation of extracts (2249);
  • suppression of the monograph for Water, highly purified (1927).

The guideline has also been updated to reflect current expectations for the minimum acceptable quality of water used in the manufacture of active substances and medicinal products for human and veterinary use.

The guideline can be read in conjunction with the questions and answers on production of water for injections by non-distillation methods – reverse osmosis and biofilms and control strategies https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/questions-answers-production-water-injections-non-distillation-methods-reverse-osmosis-biofilms_en.pdf and the comments received on the draft guideline https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/comments/overview-comments-received-draft-guideline-quality-water-pharmaceutical-use-ema/chmp/cvmp/qwp/496873/2018_en.pdf

Written by Emily Fletcher

Emily Fletcher